AI Security in 60 Seconds - How Do You Secure an AI That Can Take Action?
AI models operate inside a larger system of identities, data, tools, infrastructure and applications.
Modern AI is no longer limited to answering questions. AI agents can read files, access databases, browse the web, write code, call APIs and execute actions. [1][2], That changes the security model.
Traditional security asks:
“Can this user access the system?”
AI security must also ask:
“What is the AI allowed to see, decide and do?”
A secure AI environment therefore needs several layers of protection:
- Identity & Access: Authenticate users and enforce RBAC, scoped identities and least privilege. [2][3]
- Prompt Security: Defend against prompt injection, malicious instructions and attempts to manipulate an agent's goals. [2][3]
- Model Security: Govern approved models, system instructions, model outputs, integrity and grounding. [1][4]
- Agent & Tool Security: Restrict which tools agents can call, minimize permissions and credentials, and require human approval for sensitive actions. [2][3]
- Runtime & Network Security: Isolate risky execution, restrict network access and harden the infrastructure surrounding AI workloads. [4][5]
- Data Security: Protect sensitive information, documents, RAG data, embeddings, memory, models and secrets. [1][2][5]
- Monitoring & Governance: Log and monitor AI activity, tool usage and security events so actions can be traced, reviewed and investigated. [1][4][5]
The Key Principle
Never rely on the AI model alone to enforce security.
AI models operate inside a larger system of identities, data, tools, infrastructure and applications. Security therefore needs to be enforced around the model through permissions, isolation, validation, policy, monitoring and human oversight. [1][3][5]
References
[1] NIST Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile (NIST AI 600-1), 2024.
[2] OWASP GenAI LLM Top 10, 2026.
Covers major risks to LLM applications including prompt injection, sensitive-information exposure, poisoning and other GenAI security weaknesses.
[3] OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications, 2026.
Addresses agent-specific threats including agent goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, unexpected code execution, memory/context poisoning and rogue agents.
[4] MITRE ATLAS: Adversarial Threat Landscape for Artificial-Intelligence Systems.
A threat-informed knowledge base of adversarial tactics and techniques targeting AI-enabled systems.
[5] NSA, CISA, FBI and international partners Deploying AI Systems Securely: Best Practices for Deploying Secure and Resilient AI Systems, 2024.